On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Bill Shupp wrote: > I have released toaster-fitted version of Inter7's qmail-tap patch. It > is to be applied on top of the 0.8 qmail-toaster patch. You can > download it here: > > http://shupp.org/patches/qmail-toaster-0.8-tap1.patch > > See http://inter7.com/?page=qmailtap for details on what this patch is, > and how to use it. As always, please report any problems with this > patch to this list. >
Hello Bill, this is my first post and it's regarding to an annoyance about 'tap' patch in certain conditions. I don't know yet if this is a toaster or inter7's tap patch. Scenario: #cat /var/qmail/control/taps [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Every email sent/from domain_to_archive.com is correctly archived in [EMAIL PROTECTED] maildir with no notices in the headers about this activity. But we realized that if, for example, the user [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent an email to HIMSelf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), it appears in the header of the email that he receives (no the archived one) a explicit "Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" line Worst, under certains conditions, the same user can receive bounces about looping because [EMAIL PROTECTED] already has this Delivered-To line. I don't know if this a normal behaviour or there's a problem wherever in my configuration, but I consider that in these cases, "Tap" concept is not fullfilled. Any advice regarding this? Thanks for your time __Aline p/d: I followed step by step shupp.org/toaster and applied qmail-toaster-0.8-tap1.patch after in a Fedora box. thanks you again.
