Hello,

checks simscan recipient and sender validity ? (including badmailfrom,
badmailto) ?


2007/11/18, Joey Novak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think simscan is what you are looking for, it moves spamd, and clam to the
> qmail-send process instead of qmail-smtpd.  This is what we do.  This way,
> we have 75 incomming connections available, and only 5 local delivery
> concurrencies.  So, spamd never hoses the server.
>
> Good luck,
>
>   Joey
>
>
> On Nov 18, 2007 8:44 AM, Lampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > due to high load of server (brutaly by spamd), i want to create
> > another queue, where will be stored good messages. Let me explain
> > more:
> >
> > 1. on smtp level need to check only if recipient is valid, sender is
> > valid (checks against badhelo, badmailfrom, badmailto, and more)
> >
> > 2. if step 1 passed, store message in queue, but not for delivery, but
> > for another checking (eg message is for our server and is OK, should
> > be delivered) - from this queue should be runned qmail-scanner (or
> > something like qmail-scanner) which do rest of its work (clam, spam).
> > Of course there will be some concurent limit for this queue
> >
> > This is for high smtp concurency limit (incoming connections), now
> > when message is accepted by smtpd qmail-scanner fires spamd - eg have
> > 50 limit on incoming messages.
> >
> > Or is there other way to control spamd concurency  (or qmail-scanner)
> > limit but not lowering incoming concurency ?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > --
> > Lampa
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ---
>     http://www.joeynovak.com
>
>
>     C) 803-409-9969 (Work Cell)
>     W) 757-233-0834
>     H) 757-383-8523 (SkypeIn)
>
> Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what
> sticks
>     --Pete O'Hanlon
>
> "Very funny, Scotty. Now beam down my clothes."
>
> Be nice to nerds. Chances are you'll end up working for one.
>     --Bill Gates
>
> Your most unhappy customers are your greatest source of learning.
>     --Bill Gates
>
> Cope with Life, go buy a slurpee!
> http://www.slurpee.com/games.html


-- 
Lampa

Reply via email to