Daniel, you are really messed all the things up:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see much difference between then and now, it's the same thing.
Giving Qmail to the public domain, in my opinion, is a bad move. Now x, y
and z versions of Qmail will start to pop-up each and everyone of them
with their installation methods and alterations to the original code.
Yup. Actually, they already do. Someone call them "patches". someone
'toasters'. I guess that Shupp is one of the X Y or Z's :)
I don't also see a very big deal out of this because noone stoped you
before to make yourself binary packages with your qmail if you needed a
rapid deployment solution.
[note this:]
As long as you did not redistributed those
binary packages.
or source packages. or anything modified.
I would rather see a new version of qmail with some feature updates and
bug fixes.
yeah, that's the first step.
Actually, releasing qmail in such a way does give a way to people or
groups like Bill or the people ho do use his toaster to make source OR
binary bundles instead of installing dev packages like crazy.
Boris Pavlov
