On 15/05/2015 10:48, "Barros Pena, Belen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Sorry, I am not able to test this. I need new build data, but the builds >seem to be getting stuck at the 'checking out layers' stage. Managed to have a look at it with help from Michael. The recipe file information looks much cleaner. Thanks! Belén > >Cheers > >Belén > >On 14/05/2015 16:58, "Damian, Alexandru" <[email protected]> >wrote: >> >>* all the recipe paths are now relative to a Layer_Version checkout, no >>more absolute paths. This allows us to link a recipe file directly to a >>remote GIT repo of a Layer, if needed. >> >> >>* the "namespace" (e.g virtual:native: ) part of a recipe path is stored >>in a new field; all paths are now clean paths, so they can be manipulated >>as such. Storing the namespace separately should >> also fix the mis-identification of tasks between native and normal >>tasks, for example (multiple bugs opened on this one) >> >> >>* all the builds now occur under a Project. this is the first step for >>the unification of Managed and Interactive modes. The UI interface is not >>changed. >> >> >>* django auth tables are now created under interactive mode, too. This >>allows us to get rid of the atrocity of storing display state on the >>front-end cookies. Another step in the unification of >> modes. >> >> >>* some smaller fixes regarding data collection are in there. >> >> >>Can you please see if this makes sense to you ? >> >> >>Cheers, >>Alex >> >> >> >> >>-- >>Alex Damian >>Yocto Project >> >>SSG / OTC >> >> >> > -- _______________________________________________ toaster mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/toaster
