Kiran (Nachaki),

Iam not against to Blog in genaral. A Blog should be maintained in 
suchway that if any of our members don't have time to read blogs and 
only read "to make a difference" group messages, still he/she should 
not have any communication gap.

Hope you understand my thought behind saying Blog is not feasible to 
our group. If that problem is solved, we can have Blogging for 
our "To make a Difference" group. 


Regards
Krishna







--- In [email protected], NaChaKi 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Back to square one, I guess! This topic came up while I spoke to 
Divya off the group, and it was then we realized that those who were 
not for the blog (I'd not say they were "against" the idea - it's 
too strong a word to use.) were doing so for a common reason - 
jumping between two sites is not necessary/feasible/good. However, 
each one of those who were proponents to the idea, including yours 
truly, had a different reason to support the idea!
>    
>   Well, I have written my idea of blogs clearly: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tomakeadifference/message/1475
>    
>   I am not sure if everyone is thinking the same. Apparently, 
Divya saw the advantages of blog from a layman (:-P) point of view; 
Prasanthi had different ideas ("...blogs are for higher level 
discussion on a topic and thinking aloud. I assumed it to be a next 
level platform to the group."). 
>    
>   Prasanthi, 
>    
>   << Coming to the cases, we should post them in our group site, 
as of now it is geocities.com/dokkuface4. >>
>    
>   Please do not take it as a personal hurt, but what I felt was 
this: If I see a case, albeit genuine, on a website that had the 
id "dokkuface4", I'd have my own doubts about its authenticity. (Of 
course, if I, the reader, understands what "Dokku" meant.) I 
understand that's probably why you wanted to create the id 
tomakeadifference (or something like that). 
>    
>   We don't need a paid website, because, like you said, those 
funds can be diverted for a better cause for the needy. A free 
website is an option, say on freeservers.com (Those who know my 
personal website know that I personally prefer this, and that's 
because the website is of the format yourchoice.servername.com, i.e. 
as a sub-domain on the server and not as a sub-directory, such as 
geocities.com/dokkuface4). But, well, a website is not as 
interactive. It's also not searched by many search engines unles you 
manually request them to index the website.
>    
>   This was why *I* proposed blogs in the first place - they are 
interactive (readers can comment) and easily searchable, and you 
don't pay a pie, and you don't see any ad's on the page. Also, 
updating a blog is easier than building/editing a webpage, I feel, 
though building a simple webpage is also a job that can be done in 
minutes with the help of various tools.
>    
>   If we use the blog to "thinking aloud", the situation would go 
to what Sitaram and Krishna were opposing of - we force our members 
to be up to date with information in the group messages as well as 
blogs. (I assume that "thinking aloud" here means that we post our 
ideas there and create discussions there.) If a discussion is the 
idea of the day, blog is not a solution - we're looking at a 
discussion board or a "forum". This is not my idea either. It takes 
considerable time to maintain and moderate a forum, I speak out of 
my experience as moderator for a few fora in the past. 
>    
>   For me, a blog shall be a showcase of our work - accomplishments 
(with photos and statistics), efforts, cases, etc. and... that's it, 
for most of the time, unless members can think of more ideas to go 
into it. This is an idea that I propose(d) only so that we get more 
exposure on the WWW (Wild Wild Web, without a search engine).
>    
>   << By the way, how much space is required for us to have a 
website of our own. >>
>    
>   If we're looking at a simple website with HTML pages, it hardly 
takes about 10 MB. If you're putting pictures there, you'd need a 
lot more. But, then, a website is not just about space - it's more 
about the bandwidth needed, IMHO. Krishna gaaru is a better person 
to explain this; I am technically not as sound.
>    
>   Sincerely,
>   NaChaKi
>   PS: 1. Well, we didn't finalize the blog ideas, yet, it appears! 
But, we shall close this soon.
>   2. If people don't see a point in blogging (as defined by my 
idea above), I'd still want to go ahead with an exclusive blog for 
tomakeadifference group, with due permission from the group. So, 
please comment on that too. (Can you people believe that I can take 
care of the "official blog" all by myself? I'd be glad to do that, 
by the way!)
>










Reply via email to