George Sexton wrote:
There's no justification here. Explain why you think the code is "bad" it's actually a hell of a lot cleaner and easier to follow than the original code, and it's 15% faster. What exactly are your criteria for measuring goodness.
I stated the reason, and the main one is that it should I think be more generic. The performance improvement is just a lame trick to push through your feature, as this could as well be submitted as two separate patches (the first one being the optimizations, and the second one the wildcard host feature addition which I would -1).
"hell of a lot" just made me laugh, BTW ;) R�my --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
