"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
>
> Hans Bergsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry for starting what it might end up as a long flamewar, but reading
> >> almost 500 emails on the list I ended up a little confused... Also, in a
> >> bunch of side discussions, but related always to the same topic, I feel
> >> there's something wrong going around here...
> >
> > Thanks Pier for bringing this issue to a vote. Based on the other replies
> > to this mail, it seems to me like the majority wants Tomcat 3.x to be the
> > RI for Servlet 2.2/JSP 1.1, with production quality of course, and
> > Tomcat 4.x the RI for Servlet 2.3/JSP 1.2. That's what makes most sense
> > to me. The devil may be in the details, but I hope we can make it so.
>
> James might be an "instigator", but I'm for sure _THE_ "troublemaker" :) :)
> I fully agree with you on that. Let me explain better my position:
;-)
> I have NOTHING against a Tomcat 3.3 release, if we want to call it 3.3. The
> thing I am against is having two different releases of "Tomcat" (3.3 and
> 4.0) having the same features and capabilities...
We're in total agreement on this.
> [...]
> Servlet 2.0? Apache JServ (Actually, we might end up moving it to Jakarta as
> an "historic" piece of code when Java.Apache.ORG dies)
>
> Servlet 2.1? (fuck, we don't have it, any volunteer?)
>
> Servlet 2.2/JSP 1.1? Tomcat 3.x (3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 and so on, as long as
> there's people willing to deveop it)
>
> Servlet 2.3/JSP 1.2? Tomcat 4.x
>
> Servlet NEXT? When they come out, we'll see what we have in our hands and
> we'll decide....
>
> This _IS_ clear....
Right.
Hans
--
Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gefion Software http://www.gefionsoftware.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
