"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > I think it would be a good idea if compiled versions of the service, and other
> > native components were committed in the tree, esp for Windows.
> >
>
> I am not a fan of checking in binaries like this, for the same reason I don't want
> to check in JARs. I've seen too many cases where the developers forget to update
> the JARs, or don't remember what version it is or where they got it.
>
> I *am* a big fan of building the binaries and making them available for download,
> coordinated with releases.
+1 ... No binaries in CVS, please :)
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.betaversion.org/~pier>
