That sounds workable.. i looked for an archive of this newsgroup but didn't
have any luck - do you know where the relevant section in the JSP/servlet
spec is?

thanks!
david

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike La Budde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MVC problem


I believe one solution offerred previously on this list (thank you Craig!)
was to place all of your .jsp pages underneath /WEB-INF (e.g.
/WEB-INF/jsp/...) Since these can never be served up (goes against the
jsp/servlet spec)....

HTH,

Mike


At 11/30/2000 10:20 AM -0600, you wrote:
> > hi all..
> >
> > We're hitting a problem with the MVC approach in tomcat.
> >
> > Our controller is designed to intercept all requests for URLs within our
> > web application so that it can handle internationalization and security
> > checks centrally.
> >
> > The problem is as follows:
> > - the controller servlet registers interest in URLs of the form '*.jsp'
> > - a request for 'a.jsp' arrives and the controller checks security and
> > negotiates the locale settings
> > - the controller includes the contents of 'a.jsp' in the response
> >
> > At this point it seems that tomcat takes over. Unfortunately, it doesn't
> > retrieve the contents of the page - it just resubmits the request to the
> > controller again, resulting in an endless loop. This also occurs for a
> > 'forward'. Not good.
> >
> > One of the workarounds is to use URLs of the form '.do' to request page
> > content. This allows the controller to forward to a .jsp URL without
> > getting into a loop. The problem is that someone who knows the structure
> > of the www site can submit requests for '.jsp' directly and bypass any
> > security checks. The obvious workaround for this is to put tags into the
> > .jsp pages and java calls into any servlets to perform the security
check
> > - but this negates any advantage to the MVC approach (and forces
> > page/servlet developers to remember to place checks into all of their
> > content).
> >
> > We're probably missing something - it seems difficult to believe that
the
> > MVC approach has such a fundamental flaw.
> >
> > thanks!
> > David Aiken
> > BMC Software

Reply via email to