on 12/9/2000 3:55 PM, "Hans Bergsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know the migration of Java Apache projects has been discussed, but
> I have not seen a formal decision being made by PMC. So I like to
> run it by the PMC anyway, but based on what you say it sounds like it
> will not be any problem then.
This has already been formalized and even advertised as happening. Look at
the Jakarta and Java Apache homepages as it clearly discusses this.
In essence, I'm just trying to save everyone time here.
> Another thing. If the migrated JSSI is supposed to continue to support
> JServ (sounds reasonable)
No need to do that.
>, maybe this should be called TSSI instead to
> avoid confusion (since it relies on TC internals and use TC package names).
> An alternative would be to keep the JSSI name but use TC package names and
> make it work with JServ as well as TC 3.2 in the initial version. Comments?
+1 for TSSI.
-jon
