Bug report #569 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: <http://znutar.cortexity.com/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/569> REPORT #569 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: low Severity: non-critical Confidence: public Environment: Release: 3.2 JVM Release: 1.3 Operating System: Windows NT OS Release: 4.0 sp6a Platform: Intel Synopsis: Tag libraries not found Description: I'm using a tag library that is included using the uri "/uiTags". With Tomcat 3.1 it works nicely. It also worked with an early beta of 3.2. However, Tomcat 3.2 fails with an error and complains that it can't find the file "...\myApplication\uiTags". If I copy the tag library descriptor from WEB-INF/jsp/ui-taglibs.tld to the document root and renames it to uiTags everything works! It appears that the taglib tag ín web.xml is ignored somehow. As it works with 3.1 (and Orion) I think that the web.xml file is correct.Title: BugRat Report # 569
BugRat Report # 569
| Project: Tomcat | Release: 3.2 |
| Category: Bug Report | SubCategory: New Bug Report |
| Class: swbug | State: received |
| Priority: low | Severity: non-critical |
|
Confidence:
public
|
Submitter:
_Anonymous ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Date Submitted:
Dec 12 2000, 06:35:35 CST
Responsible:
Z_Tomcat Alias ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
- Synopsis:
- Tag libraries not found
- Environment: (jvm, os, osrel, platform)
- 1.3, Windows NT, 4.0 sp6a, Intel
- Additional Environment Description:
- Report Description:
- I'm using a tag library that is included using the uri "/uiTags". With Tomcat 3.1 it works nicely. It also worked with an early beta of 3.2. However, Tomcat 3.2 fails with an error and complains that it can't find the file "...\myApplication\uiTags". If I copy the tag library descriptor from WEB-INF/jsp/ui-taglibs.tld to the document root and renames it to uiTags everything works! It appears that the taglib tag ín web.xml is ignored somehow. As it works with 3.1 (and Orion) I think that the web.xml file is correct.
- Workaround:
- null
