on 12/15/2000 3:56 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the case of jakarta-regexp, can this be done instead of putting the > version number on the name of the jar file itself? > > - Sam Ruby There is nothing wrong with putting the version number on the .jar file and it help WAY to many people to do so. One thing I just thought of that I would be willing to do is to build the .jar file into /bin without a version number on it and then "build dist" would then put the version number on it. -jon
- RE: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [tomcat-4.0]... Sam Ruby
- RE: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [tomcat... cmanolache
- RE: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [tomcat... Sam Ruby
- RE: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [to... Jon Stevens
- RE: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [tomcat... Morrison, John
- Re: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [tomcat... Stuart Roebuck
- Re: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [to... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re:... Paul Speed
- Re: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [to... Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [tomcat... Sam Ruby
- Re: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [to... Jon Stevens
- Re: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [to... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [tomcat... Sam Ruby
- RE: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [tomcat... Steve Downey