Thanks for the reply,
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> David Rees wrote:
>
> > Anyone have any technical comments on the message below? I think that
> > printing a stack dump in this case can be very useful, but
> someone else may
> > have a different view.
> >
>
> For developers, you certainly want to be able to see the stack
> traces. However,
> many developers do *not* want such cruft showing to users -- so
> it was made
> configurable (thanks to the efforts of Larry Isaacs) -- see the
> <ContextManager>
> attribute called "showDebugInfo" in the conf/server.xml file.
>
> It looks like this case was missed. I'm +1 on adding a stack
> trace, but it
> should be made conditional just like other stack traces are.
OK, I'll see if I can get some time to create a proper patch for this case,
then (unless someone beats me to it, I probably won't have time until after
X-Mas)
-Dave
