> It is so funny, we keep going back and forth over stuff that is clearly
> Costin's FUD. He is attacking me directly with FUD and you are
> believing it.
No it is not. The expression "Jon's rules" just has to do with the way
you push things down other people's throats. And when things don't go the
way you want and you decide to switch a -1 into a +1, you fill the subject
of the e-mail as "Fuck It".
What you call being "very opinative" I call "Jon's rules". For me, opinions
are waves and what you do are tsunamis.
Today (tonight here) I am just taking the time to be as insisting with you
as you usually are with others. (It takes a lot of time huh?) But I think I
am not being nearly as impolite.
What makes me write is not what Costin writes and I got no FUD from him.
What makes me write is what you write and the way you do it.
So, I guess that saying that what makes me talk is "clearly Costin's FUD",
as you just did, ...is clearly FUD.
Have fun,
Paulo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 02:42
>
>
> on 1/15/01 5:41 PM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Those are the "Jon's rules" I was talking about before.
> >
> > Paulo
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 02:30
> >>
> >
> >> My mistake - it is of course a "project decision", the question should
> >> have been - does it looks like the "decision" Jon is invoking
> to justify
> >> stopping 3.3 ? Does it look like what Jon is claiming that I'm
> alone and
> >> all other developers have decided for 4.0 ?
> >>
> >> Costin
>
> How is that "Jon's rules"?
>
> I haven't made an decision for the project one way or another (in fact, if
> anything I gave a +1 for everything which I had previously -1'd...see my
> "Fuck It" email that I previously posted) and as far as "my
> claims", that is
> based on the votes that have already clearly passed.
>
> Let me refer you (yet again) to this url for the reference:
> <http://w6.metronet.com/~wjm/tomcat/2000/Aug/index.html#00195>
>
> So, I'm still confused, how do you translate that into "Jon's rules"????
>
> It is so funny, we keep going back and forth over stuff that is clearly
> Costin's FUD. He is attacking me directly with FUD and you are
> believing it.
> I don't get it. Wake up dude. Look at the facts, not Costin's FUD.
>
> -jon
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
