Dave Oxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but APR is meant as a library of API's that are
> separate from Apache2 and should therefore be able to be used with
> Apache1.3. What I would be concerned about is that there hasn't been a final
> (let alone beta) of APR/Apache2 and is therefore subject to change. If
> APR/Apache2 was to be made final before Tomcat4 becomes final then I don't
> see a problem, but....
Let's say, webapp needs to use 10% of APR, but that 10% represents 90% of
its complexity (shmem, mutexes, I/O)... Even if it's not final when Tomcat 4
goes final, that shouldn't prevent us from using it... It's a good library,
and why doing ourselves what others are already doing (and are far more
knowledgeable than whoever is on this list, I might add!)
I trust the HTTPd and APR teams 100%
> Dave ...under a bit less snow in England :)
It was just snowing this morning.. Thank god it ended..
Pier (under the snow in Dublin)
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pier Fumagalli <http://www.betaversion.org/> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
