> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > >damn! i wasn't expecting that complex of an answer ;) > > > > The difficulty is in the difference between TC 3.2/3.3 and 4.0 > > and the how the connector are written. They're just to highly > > linked in the tomcat core ! > > Well, someone can reimplement the protocol ( it's just a protocol ). > > The 3.3 adapter is not linked to the tomcat core, but more to the > low-level objects ( and most of the performance comes from that > layer ). In other words - minimal garbage generation, lazy evaluation, > and all the stuff. Unless everyone's in a hurry to port mod_jk on TC 4 ASAP, I suggest waiting a bit. I'll be spending time on a "new" connector architecture for TC 4 which will actually be very similar to the one in TC 3.3 (except hopefully even cleaner and simpler). That should make porting mod_jk much easier if there are still people who want to do that. Remy
- RE: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp13 question) GOMEZ Henri
- Re: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp13 questi... kevin seguin
- RE: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp13 questi... cmanolache
- Re: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp13 qu... Remy Maucherat
- Re: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp1... cmanolache
- Re: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp1... kevin seguin
- Re: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp13 questi... kevin seguin
- RE: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp13 questi... GOMEZ Henri
- RE: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp13 questi... GOMEZ Henri
- Re: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp13 qu... kevin seguin
- RE: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp13 questi... Ignacio J. Ortega
- RE: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp13 questi... GOMEZ Henri
- RE: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp13 questi... GOMEZ Henri
- RE: porting ajp13 to tomcat 4 (was Re: ajp13 questi... Ignacio J. Ortega