Yeah, I'll see what I can do to fix this.  But It may be a day or two.

Marc Saegesser wrote:
> 
> Bloody hell.  I was just about to launch into a wonderful tirade about why
> we shouldn't have change Tomcat just to work around some buggy compiler from
> Microsoft when I realized the real problem isn't what you think it is.
> 
> The problem isn't the definition of the inner class, but the use of the
> PrivilegedAction interface.  This interface didn't appear until JDK1.2 and
> my guess is that your using JDK1.1.
> 
> Tomcat 3.2.x, because it implements the Servlet 1.1 specification must
> maintain compatibility with JDK1.1 so this is a real Tomcat bug and it will
> need to be fixed before releasing Tomcat 3.2.2.
> 
> Glenn, can you take a look at this?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Oxley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 12:32 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.2.2 beta 4
> >
> >
> > I posted this before but got no response.
> >
> > The change to SessionUtil.java 1.5.2.2 to 1.5.2.3 (3.2.1->3.2.2b1) has
> > caused the Microsoft Virtual Machine to fall over when running
> > Tomcat. The
> > M$ VM does not like internal classes defined within methods (I
> > think this is
> > the problem) and throws a NoClassDefFoundException.
> >
> > I am running Windows2000 with IE5.5(a vm update came with 5.5)
> > although it
> > is probably the same on all M$ VMs.
> >
> > This means that I cannot debug servlets in Visual J++ which is a real
> > problem for us. (Until we find an IDE as stable and fast as VJ++!)
> >
> > Dave
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Nielsen             [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder    |
MOREnet System Programming               |  * if iz ina coment.      |
Missouri Research and Education Network  |  */                       |
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to