On Wed, 30 May 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:

> Hello Paul,
> 
> This definitely sounds like something wrong with Tomcat 4 -- most likely a
> combination of things related to the browser (which can affect which HTTP
> version is in use), your filters, and the ultimate servlet or JSP page
> being called.  To help narrow things down a bit:
> * Do you have a small test case we can use to investigate this?
>   If so, you can send it either to TOMCAT-DEV or to me in private mail.
> * Are your clients using HTTP/1.0 or HTTP/1.1?
> * Does your filter create a wrapper on the servlet response, or is it
>   just passing things through?
> 
> I suspect that somewhere along the line the output stream isn't getting
> flushed or closed in a timely manner -- the above information will be
> helpful to be able to identify where.
> 
> Craig
> 

I just added some more unit tests that do output filtering, and they all
work immediately.  I now more strongly suspect that this problem is
related to some combination of using HTTP/1.1, the particular filters and
wrappers being executed, and Tomcat not flushing something somewhere when
it is supposed to -- but a real-life example would be tremendously helpful
in tracking it down further.

Craig


> 
> On Wed, 30 May 2001, Paul Butcher wrote:
> 
> > All,
> > 
> > Many apologies if this isn't the correct list for this message. Please
> > point me in the right direction if I've made a mistake.
> > 
> > I've been experiencing problems with latency and filters in Tomcat 4
> > (both beta 1 and beta 5). A search of the mailing list archives showed
> > up the exchange summarised below, which I believe relates to the same
> > problem that I've been experiencing. I've done some further research,
> > however, and I have reason to believe that the problem may be a little
> > more serious than this exchange implies. I have an example which
> > demonstrates the problem reliably which I would be delighted to make
> > available if someone can tell me how to do so (I assume that attaching a
> > .war file to this message isn't the right way!).
> > 
> > Like Kevin, I've been experiencing approximately a 30 second latency
> > when using filters in Tomcat. Unlike Kevin, I'm using URI patterns to
> > set up my filters, rather than filter chains. I experience the problem
> > reliably every time.
> > 
> > Also like Kevin, I experience different behaviour when connecting via IE
> > and Netscape. I have reason to believe that the problem is not with IE,
> > however; Netscape just copes with it slightly more gracefully. I have
> > also been using WAP 'phones to connect (my main aim is serving WML pages
> > to WAP 'phones) and they also experience latency problems.
> > 
> > When connecting to a filtered JSP with IE, the result isn't displayed
> > for approximately 30 seconds. Something then obviously times out and the
> > page is displayed correctly. The problem is definitely "after" the
> > filter has been called - I've added simple logging to my example filter
> > and its doFilter function completes almost immediately.
> > 
> > When connecting to the same page with Netscape 6, the results display
> > almost immediately. The connection to the server isn't closed, however
> > (the "N" in the top right continues to animate and the progress bar at
> > the bottom doesn't reach 100%). Unlike IE, the connection doesn't seem
> > to time out after 30 seconds. I've not had the patience to wait long
> > enough to see when it does time out (its certainly in excess of a
> > minute).
> > 
> > When using a WAP 'phone, the 'phone times out with an error.
> > 
> > The problem only occurs if I use my filter on a JSP file. It does not
> > occur when the filter is used on a "plain" HTML file.
> > 
> > If there are any more details that I can provide, please let me know and
> > I'll do my best.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > pbutcher->msgCount++
> > 
> > --
> > Team Leader, Argogroup plc
> > http://www.argogroup.com/
> > 
> > 
> > >From: "Kevin Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:27:34 -0000 >To:
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > >Subject: RE: Filter Chains slow first time it is called 
> > >
> > >I've just taken a closer look at this, it's a browser problem.
> > >
> > >IE 5.5 has really trouble with content types. Even though I'm setting
> > the
> > >type to text/html (in a filter) but at some point I've used IE 5.5 to
> > get
> > >the data without the filter. The servlet returns text/xml. It seems
> > that
> > >IE5.5 is struggling to reconcile this (that's all I can think of).
> > >
> > >Netscape has no problems (for once :-) ),
> > >
> > >Kevin Jones
> > >DevelopMentor
> > >www.develop.com
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 31 January 2001 19:21
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Filter Chains slow first time it is called
> > >
> > >
> > > Kevin Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > Subject says it all really.
> > > >
> > > > The first time a filter chain is executed for a servlet, it
> > > takes about 30
> > > > seconds for the response to get back to the client.
> > > >
> > >
> > > It would be surprising if this is related to initializing the
> > > filter chain --
> > > after all, the chain is constructed for every single request (not just
> > the
> > > first one).  Are you sure there isn't anything application
> > > specific that takes
> > > a long time to initialize?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > This doesn't happen everytime but enough to be repeatable.
> > > >
> > > > I'm using Beta 1. I've set the app to be reloadable (with a
> > > reload time of
> > > > 3) and I'm logging to the console if that helps,
> > > >
> > >
> > > Logs and a test case (even if it doesn't repeat evey single time)
> > would be
> > > quite useful in investigating this.
> > 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to