>> >> Oh, BTW, I don't want to see libtool used anywhere... The
>> >would would be a
>> >> better place without that evil thing... (Doesn't run on OS/X)
>> >
>> >You mean it does not support OS/X yet or that is buggy?
>> >What about aplibtool?
>>
>> I used to be a Mac Developpers (10 years ago) and allways like
>> this platform even if I didn't have one no more ;(
>>
>> libtool is used in major Unix project and discarding this tool
>> for it's 'actual' OS/X incompatibility seems a bad idea.
>
>I will try to get access to an OS/X machine to check libtool
>there (I have
>already adapted libtool to the BS2000 mainframe, hopefully it
>is more easy to
>fix libtool that not using it).
I've got a challenge for you. Port libtool to AS/400 :)
>> It will help remove HUGE quantity of questions like
>>
>> HOW TO BUILD XXX under HP-UX 10, AIX 4.2, SUN-OS 4.1,
>SOLARIS 8, LINUX 2.4,
>>
>> >I agree that libtool could be an evil thing.
>> >I will try to use LD and CC instead libtool or shlibtool when
>> >it is possible.
>>
>> When building shared libs, libtool will be our friend.
>
>I have just noted that apxs of Apache-2.0 calls libtool...
>libtool has to be our
>friend!
>
>By the way my apxs (2.0) tries to build an excutable instead a
>dynamic library,
>has someone seen a problem like that? (evil libtool or JF's
>big fingers?:-( ).
I didn't have such problem here using Linux :)
And I use your apache 2.0 (or may be mine, what was the latest
of our 2 pacthes commit ?)
