[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, kevin seguin wrote:
>
> > i've been thinking about this, and, well, isn't this BaseRequest you're
> > talking about kind of what org.apache.coyote.Request is? does it make
> > sense to have two of these kinds of objects hanging around? is
> > o.a.c.Request roughly equivalent to core.Request in tomcat 3??
>
> Certainly not for the second part - the core.Request in tomcat3 has a lot
> of tomcat3-specific code ( Container, ContextManager, calls to hooks to
> get special info like encoding, etc ).
>
> The BaseRequest ( or o.a.c.Request ) is focused on the
> "basic" information associated with a request, as received by the protocol
> adapter.
>
> For the first part - that's true, AjpRequest is very similar in goal with
> o.a.c.Request ( thanks to the refactoring you did :-).
>
> As I said, I like o.a.coyote, but right now my goal is to see Ajp14
> working, and using the existing (working) AjpRequest is easier. Also,
> coyote has more than the base request - I would let this settle down.
>
i hear that :) my immediate goal is ajp13 for tomcat 4 :) i've checked
in an intial version of BaseRequest. it may need some further work...
-kevin.
