Clere Jean-Frederic FSC EP LP COM 5 wrote:
>
> "Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
> >
> > Craig R. McClanahan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Thom Park wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> is there a tarbundle somewhere of the latest (circa-Tomcat 4-b6) web-app
> > >> connector stuff anywhere?
> > >
> > > Will, it would have been there already if the person slated to do the work
> > > (Pier) hadn't been broken into last night, with several PCs and a bunch of
> > > other stuff stolen :-(.
> >
> > No, it would have been already there if I didn't forget to copy them to the
> > WWW server after I rolled them today at the cops station :)
> >
> > They're up now, at
> >
> > <http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0-b6/src>
> >
> > Sources only... Whoever tries to build them is more than welcome (meaning
> > I'm going to shoot you if you don't) to tell so, report problems and so on.
> >
> > For B6, I didn't update the Makefiles for Win32, so, those still need to be
> > fixed, but they should work on any platform where APR has been ported to.
> >
> > The APR version included is quite old, pre SMS (those who don't know what it
> > is, SMS is a huge piece of code that was committed some weeks ago dealing
> > with memory and so on, even though I trust David Reid and he told me it was
> > OK, I'd rather bundle an older and more secure version, found to compile
> > almost everywhere) and I'm planning to update to the more recent one after I
> > hear what comes up with Apache 2.0b21 (shouldn't change anything, just some
> > testing).
> >
> > It's not "yet" a "beta" as it doesn't include documentation (especially for
> > the WARP protocol, and Jean Frederic will kill me if I don't write it - he's
> > in France, much closer to me than you guys in California, and so way more
> > scary :), and because there are still some WatchDog tests not working.
>
> Well, I am leaving in Barcelona but I am french and I have been mountain biking
> in the Pyreenees for the week-end.
>
> Should I try to spend some time on the not (yet) working Watchdog tests will you
> are arranging the spec's?
Well, the watchdog tests are OK now.
Just a question about DoInit1Test. As it throws exception in init() what should
be the behaviour if called more than once? (it returns 404).
>
> >
> > Apart from all this bullshit, it's _way_ more stable than the previous one,
> > the new protocol (WARP/0.9, getting close to 1.0 if this one proves
> > satisfactory) holds much better than the previous one (in several tests I
> > made, approximately 50000 hits, I never dropped the socket - whohooo!).
> >
> > So, have fun, try it out, and get me some feedback :)
> >
> > Cheers...
> >
> > Pier
