> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: ajp13, tc 3.3
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Keith Wannamaker wrote:
>
> > I think ajp is handling the missing content length case OK,
> except we
> > might need to send an initial body chunk even if
> contentlength is not
> > specified.
> >
> > I was hoping to get it in tc 3.3 since tc is not quite
> doing what one
> > would expect from reading the spec. How about I post a
> diff for review
> > and we go from there?
>
> What about this: we do the change in facade ( if Larry is +1
> on this !),
> since they are clearly breaking the spec: -1 means unknown
> length, not no
> content. It should be a simple change, we just must make sure
> we check all
> places where ContentLength is used and fix it everywhere.
To make sure I am in sync, exactly which spec are you refering to.
Thanks.
Larry
>
> I think Ajp13 connector can also be easily fixed.
>
> For C side - I would sugest you do it in j-t-c. The code there has few
> other enhancements, including the very nice configure, and can be used
> instead of the native in the main branch. Also, if something bigger is
> needed in the java side of the connector - I would use ajp14.
>
> Costin
>
