Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> >>
> >> "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Pier,
> >>>
> >>> I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with
> >>> mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for
> >>> mod_webapp with a statically linked Apache of is it still DSO only?
> >>
> >> It's still DSO-only... Any particular reason why you can't use mod_so?
> >>
> >> Pier
> >
> > It's just that statically linked Apache is faster then the DSO version,
> > uses less memory and mod_jk (which I use now with TC 3.3) works with it
> > just fine (I use my own script to build mod_jk shipped with TC 3.3 and
> > j-t-c version comes with support for statically linked Apache).
> >
> > Apart from that, no, not really.
>
> Faster? Well, probably yes, during startup... But once you have the pointer
> to the module structure, it's as-fast as statically linked...
>
> Can be done (after 4.0 final).
Thanks. I've just noticed your post at Bugzilla. Nice touch ;-)
No hurry at all (I'm not even using TC 4 yet, just keeping my options
open). And mod_jk does a nice job anyway...
Bojan
