>My opinion is, the binary RPM should contain only Jakarta >stuff. If there are a >few required jars that we cannot easily redistribute, then I'm >okay with >leaving them out. Maybe we create a new top-level text doc, >"RPM-README" or >something, outlining what you need to do if you just installed >the RPM distro. I agree so could we have required jars (exception of JSSE) somewhere in a tarball which could be used to build another RPM
- RE: TC 4.0 RPM Packaging - WAS: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache ... Christopher Cain
- Re: TC 4.0 RPM Packaging - WAS: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ap... GOMEZ Henri
- Re: TC 4.0 RPM Packaging - WAS: [ANNOUNCEMENT... Christopher Cain
- RE: TC 4.0 RPM Packaging - WAS: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ap... Craig R. McClanahan