> AFAIK there is no plan for a 3.4 release after 3.3 - that doesn't mean 3.x
> will be obsolete, just that the core is now stable and unlikely to
> change, except bugfixes.
>
> Having a stable core is essential for module development and for enhancing
> the current set of modules. Even if there are many improvements we can add
> to 3.3, I believe the benefit of keeping 3.3 stable is far bigger.
>
> It is not yet decided how we'll release the new modules, but the main
> idea is to keep the 'base' version as small and clean as possible, and
> all features to be 'add-ons', outside of the base distribution, and have
> only bug fixes in 3.3.x-releases.
>
> Costin
>
If the added modules and enhancement contribute significant additional
features to the existing 3.3, I think it is better to call it 3.4 instead
if calling it 3.3.x.
Of course, before we officially call it 3.4, somebody must write a release
proposal first and having the proposal voted in the list. :-)
Punky
