jean-frederic clere wrote: > Gerard van Enk wrote: > >>Chad Johnson wrote: >> >> >>>Hey, >>> Pier can correct me on this, but I believe mod_webapp is still beta >>>quality. So grabbing whats in CVS is a safe bet. The binarys that come >>>with Tomcat 4.0.1 have some bugs that have since been corrected (ie only >>>being able to reference web apps in $CATALINA_HOME/webapps). >>> >>I don't think Pierre will correct you very soon, because I believe he's >>gonna be offline for quite some time (I read somewhere he's gonna travel >>a lot). >>But I believe you're correct on this one, grabbing something from cvs >>(or a nightly build) is better, because a few import bugs have been fix >>in cvs, but not in the version that's included in Tomcat4.0.1. >> >>Maybe someone of the Tomcat developers (that's why I'm cc-en this to >>tomcat-dev) could update the official version, or are there any bugs to >>be fixed in cvs? >> > > I have noted 5 bugs that I am trying to fix (4367, 4925, 4559 and 2941) and I > have marked 4545 as fixed. >
The first one (4367) doesn't contain a lot of info, I am running Apache and mod_webapp without segfaults..... > A Big one with Apache-2.0 is due to some changes in httpd-2.0. > > But I think it would not be bad to make a release even with some opened bugs , > the old release is a little too old. > > Any comments? I think it's a good idea to make a release. Gerard -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
