GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > What's the final status of versioning ? > > - jtc/jk/native mod_jk 1.2 > - jtc/jk/native2 mod_jk 2.0 > > So we could make soon a release of mod_jk 1.2. > > BTW: I need guidelines to create the JTC, at least jk webpages. > > - Did we have to choose anakia / buildsite ?
Anakia so that it looks like the rest of jakarta.apache.org. > - what will be the URL ? (http://jakarta.apache.org/jtc/) ? http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors/? > where will it be put on jakarta.apache.org ? Add a link in http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/index.html > > I plan to move some of the current Tomcat 3.3 documents, > ie mod_jk, IIS, part of SSL to this page. I would also put there the mod_webapp existing documents. > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_]____ > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:12 AM > >To: Tomcat Developers List > >Subject: RE: JK versions > > > > > >>After reading the commit log - most changes related to jk_channel, > >>jk_registry, etc are pretty safe ( as they don't change any logic ). > >> > >>We could actually release Jk1.2 using the main tree - if everyone is > >>comfortable with that. If not - Oct21 is probably a good point > >>to branch > >>( the release date for 3.3 ). > >> > >>There are few fixes for ebcdic support and few small things that would > >>have to be re-applied. > > > >Let's get the old version, and then I'll reapply the EBCDIC changes. > >We should keep ajp12 is JK 1.2 :) > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >For additional commands, e-mail: > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
