> > i'm 97% sure about this patch, but since i don't know this > code as well as > > some, i'd like someone else to review it. > > This seems to be the main problem we had so far with jk - > buffers beeing > reused before they're ready. For jk2 we must make sure we have more > control over that or allocate enough buffers. >
i think in this case it's the wrong buffer being used -- the post data is being read into the reply buffer rather than into the post buffer that will be sent to the java side. > > this same test fails on the java side of ajp using the ajp > stuff on the head > > in j-t-c/jk. again, an infinite loop. i haven't been able > to figure it out > > yet... if somebody wants extra points ... ;) > > You fixed what branch :-) ? I'll try to reproduce this. > i haven't checked anything in yet because i'm not positive i'm right -- not familiar enough with the code, don't want to break anything else! :) -kevin. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
