On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >couldn't the connector be solely > >responsible for > >this? the connector could add a cookie to the response, then read this > >cookie on subsequent requests, and then you wouldn't have to > >add stuff to > >servlet containers to handle this. or, i could be totally off base :) > > Could we add another cookie in http reply ? Spec compliant ? > What to be used when you have to use URL encoded instead since > cookies are not available ?
It'll not work. URL rewriting is the issue - the session id ( i.e. what will be sent on the next request ) will end up inside html pages, where mod_jk can't 'rewrite' it. And adding a cookie will fail if no cookies are available ( again where url rewriting will be used ). The session id that a servlet sees must have the vmroute in it. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
