DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5769>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5769 NT Service display name should not be used as service name ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-01-24 00:19 ------- Ultimately, the display name and service name should be specified independently. The previously posted patches were aimed at a compromise that would avoid having to change the command line but allow nicer display names. However, that makes the service name look a bit goofy. An even better patch for this would modify the command line arg to take both a service name and a display name. I'll see if I can submit another patch along these lines. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
