Ainsi parlait Craig R. McClanahan : > > I'd like to clarify. I could have activation, javamail, jdbc-ext, > > jndi, jta, which are Sun products, included in a Tomcat tarball > > but couldn't have them included in a separate tarball ? > > Yes. > > > Thanks to explain us why ? > > Because that's what the "Redistribution" paragraph of the license that you > had to click through says you can do and not do. (See why it's a good > idea to actually *read* these things? :-) Craig, you've still not answered precisely to my question. Please explain us if what we are doing violates BLC because: 1) we just allow separate download of BLC-licenced code, even if others projects do it also. 2) we allow separate download of BLC-licenced code without having to explicitely click on a "i agree" button, even if BLC text is included in the release.
The first point would prevent us from any packaging of those libraries, but the second could be solved quite easily with http download. It would prevents us anyway of using ftp repository or automated upgrade facilities as urpmi or apt-get, tough. -- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
