Actually, Larry is right. However, what is being asked for is rather silly. Personally, I'd go for INVALID since section 8.1 (of the 2.3 spec) only talks about paths, not URIs. ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:59 AM Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6267] - RequestDispatcher breaks on URLs with anchors
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6267>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6267 > > RequestDispatcher breaks on URLs with anchors > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: > > What |Removed |Added > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED > Resolution|DUPLICATE | > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-02-06 14:59 ------- > Tried the War file with Tomcat 4.0.2-b2 and it still shows the problem. I think > the fix for 6115 only applied to encodeURL() which this webapp isn't using. > (Tomcat 3.3 needs fixing too.) > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
