> "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> The idea in jakarta-tomcat-service is to implement JSR96 > >>> (http://jcp.org/jsr/detail/96.jsp). > >>> jakarta-tomcat-4.1/service is to allow run tomcat on port 80 as a > > daemon... > >> > >> The Apache Software Foundation is voting NO on the publication of JSR-096, > >> since the spec sucks, and we weren't able to make the spec lead come to an > >> agreement. > > > > That makes sense. If the spec sucks, and the lead doesn't want to improve > > it, there's no reason to support it ;-) > > > > And would you support moving that code to the commons ? It has 0 > > dependencies with TC, plus it would broaden its audience. > > Yes... No problems with that... Actually over there it has more visibility > to Peter D. and Geir, who were my "pals" on JSR-096... > > I wrote a doc on why JSR-096 sucks, along with an alternative API (which is > what a bunch of us on JSR-096 wanted but the spec lead didn't want to > follow)... Do you want that? It has some more reviews up to date... > > (BTW, I don't follow this list much ATM - new job outside of the scope of > Tomcat - so if you have something urgent just CC me as J.F. does :)
Ok, done. BTW, as I mentioned, there's already a 'services' component in commons. Are you ok with renaming the spec from service -> daemon ? Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
