Also, somebody in o.a.c.tomcat4 needs to fire the ACTION_REQ_SSL_ATTRIBUTE action. That's the Coyote replacement for CertificateValve. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:50 PM Subject: Re: Resend: SSL portability and Coyote
> > This didn't make it out the first time so I'm resending... > > > > I'm looking at what needs to be done to make the 3.3 SSL portablity > > stuff work properly with Coyote. For the most part, this work has been > > done--if you set the SSLImplementation appropriately and the correct > > factory gets invoked. However, there appear to be some issues with > > CoyoteServerSocketFactory and it's handling of configuration > > directives: > > > > (1) CoyoteServerSocketFactory appears to be willing to handle a > > "socketFactoryName". AFAICT, this is supplanted by SSLImplementation > > and none of the other code does anything with it. Any reason not to > > remove support for this directive entirely? > > I had no idea what was useful. > > > (2) JSSE uses one keyfile (the keystore). PureTLS uses three, the > > keyfile, the CA file, and the random file. I need to add new > > directives to ServerSocketFactory to propagate those. > > +1. > > Remy > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
