> "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes, it's horrible. Given the way the old HTTP/1.1 connector is written it's > > very hard and very risky to fix :-( > > As long as 4.0.4 will work... I'd like to see either that fixed, or a > working replacement with Coyote.
You'll have the working replacement for tricky situations. Fixing it would likely mean breaking more things (no, I didn't rewrite the thing because I was bored). I would plan on trying to use 4.1.x if I were you, though. > > Use Coyote instead for deperate situations ;-) > > At least, one version which doesn't throw a NPE (I suppose it does help). > > 1.0b8 works under 4.0.3. No problems but NIP (not in production) Yes, I understand. > > I tried the example you mentioned above and your "nasty" 302 AvantGo > > servlet, and both work fine in 4.1.1 (and 4.1.0 probably). > > It's not "nasty" it's perfectly fine... Sorry, I misquoted you, you actually called it "stupid" ;-) > To go in production I added a > response.flushBuffer() at the end so that it fixed the behavior, but I > shouldn't have to do that... Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
