I started take a look at patches, but I didn't like the Sleep(10). Why did you put a Sleep only in Windows case ?
- Henri Gomez ___[_]____ EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-----Original Message----- >From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:24 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [PATCH] mod_jk 1.2.0 workers pool > > > >Think this solves a lot of problems (at least to my tests). >Don't forget to add the worker.ajp13.poolsize=nn in the >workers.properties (this is the actual number of workers (connections) >to the TC), the default is 1. > >This value should be close to the number of predicted client >connections, or to the desired no of TC threads. (didn't done some >serious profiling). > >How it works: > >At startup we create the nn workers, and the actual clients gets >serialized through those workers (nothing fancy, just a safe >multithreading I hope). > >Need in the jk_worker.c solution for: > >+#ifdef WIN32 >+ Sleep(10); >+#else >+ >+#endif > >This is the loop that waits for a worker to finish serving request if >non free has been found. > >That's it. > >MT. > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
