Ok so mod_jk 1.2.0 seems to be stable also on IIS. Good news.
- Henri Gomez ___[_]____ EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-----Original Message----- >From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:27 PM >To: 'Mladen Turk'; 'Tomcat Developers List' >Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; GOMEZ Henri >Subject: RE: mod_jk testing (WAS RE: mod_jk 1.2.0 workers pool) > > >Ahhh, finally got to do the test on a capable machine, but very >overloaded with some db procecesses, dont take anything from the >absolute timing i know are very bad.., > >For all the other, my test seem ok.. > > >Server Software: Microsoft-IIS/5.0 >Server Hostname: ciberlogic >Server Port: 80 > >Document Path: /examples/jsp/snp/snoop.jsp >Document Length: 713 bytes > >Concurrency Level: 200 >Time taken for tests: 39.937500 seconds >Complete requests: 10000 >Failed requests: 0 >Write errors: 0 >Total transferred: 8909265 bytes >HTML transferred: 7130000 bytes >Requests per second: 250.39 [#/sec] (mean) >Time per request: 798.750 [ms] (mean) >Time per request: 3.994 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent >requests) >Transfer rate: 217.84 [Kbytes/sec] received > >Connection Times (ms) > min mean[+/-sd] median max >Connect: 0 1 5.8 0 281 >Processing: 78 791 4566.9 250 39718 >Waiting: 15 766 4568.4 250 39718 >Total: 78 792 4566.9 250 39718 > >Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > 50% 250 > 66% 265 > 75% 265 > 80% 281 > 90% 312 > 95% 453 > 98% 812 > 99% 39656 > 100% 39718 (longest request) > >Saludos , >Ignacio J. Ortega > > >> -----Mensaje original----- >> De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Enviado el: 21 de junio de 2002 8:19 >> Para: 'Tomcat Developers List' >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; GOMEZ Henri >> Asunto: mod_jk testing (WAS RE: mod_jk 1.2.0 workers pool) >> Importancia: Alta >> >> >> First some things about testing: >> >> DO NOT USE the date.jsp (it could return various html >lengths, so from >> there are coming those Failed requests ). >> I've just browsed through the source code of ab and it uses the first >> page as its length ethalon, and date.jsp could retur various >length if >> the tests are finishing on the single second interval so >> there is 1 byte >> html length differnce. >> >> Use the /examples/jsp/snp/snoop.jsp instead (think it allways returns >> the same content-length). >> >> The ones that count are only the 'Non-2xx responses' >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: 20. lipanj 2002 22:37 >> > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' >> > Subject: RE: mod_jk 1.2.0 workers pool >> > >> > >> > > -----Mensaje original----- >> > > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Enviado el: 20 >> > > de junio de 2002 20:29 >> > >> > I need time to prepare a machine that can handle this level >> > of concurrency, Mladen used -c 200, i need to switch to one >> > of the servers, :(, Thanks to microsoft, W2k professional >> > only can handle 10 simultaneus connections :((((.. >> > >> It's a IIS thing I think. >> >> > I think Mlanden uses XP, right? which version ? Home, >> > Professional? do you know the exact number of concurrent >> > connections the XP version you use can handle? >> > >> >> Its Professional. And if I'm running the snoop.jsp with -c 200: >> >> 181857 [Thread-4] ERROR server.JkCoyoteHandler - Error in >action code >> java.net.SocketException: Software caused connection abort: >> socket write >> error >> >> And, >> >> 181867 [Thread-4] ERROR common.ChannelSocket - Error, closing >> connection >> java.net.SocketException: Software caused connection abort: >> JVM_recv in >> socket input stream read >> >> Running with -c 10 doesn't produce such a error. >> >> >> MT. >> >> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
