[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I don't think model mbeans can be used for some of the > stuff that I want ( in jk ), and I think it is much easier to > use the automatic introspection based dynamic mbeans. >
Hmm, I don't get it. Might be me not understanding JMX well enough (need to buy that darned book), but: Model MBeans are Dynamic MBeans. The can set themselves up automatically using introspection, but you end up not having all the meta data. So people tend to write utilities (like commons-modeller or JBoss's XMBeans) to help manage the meta-data. The MBeans in o.a.c.mbeans actually implement concrete wrapper classes around the managed resource, but that's a bit unusual, and most of them could just use introspection. Since ModelMBeans are Dynamic MBeans, what sorts of problems were you running into? There was some mention of yet-another format for XML MBean meta-data files, is that really the plan? -- Christopher St. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] DistribuTopia http://www.distributopia.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
