Remy: I just fixed one serious bug in jk2/java ( the one reported by David Oxley ). I think we need a 4.1.7 for that ( and possibly other bug fixes ). We are pretty close IMHO.
Henri: what about tagging the workspace for mod_jk1 with 1.2.0, and use the same naming convention as in 4.1.x. Nacho, Mladen: same thing for mod_jk2 - we should use the 'milestone' style, and mod_jk2.0.0 will be the first tagged milestone. There is no need for anything fancy - it's just an alpha release. I think we should try to synchronize a bit - and maybe tag jk1.2.0 and jk2.0.0 at the same time with 4.1.7. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
