Ryan Lubke wrote: > >> The port MUST be the one in the Host Header if one is present,and should >> be present if the request is HTTP1.1 compliant, >> > What if the Host header is supplied, but the value is empty. This seems > legal per section 14.23 of the HTTP/1.1 RFC?
It is legal in the case that "the requested URI does not include an Internet host name". I have no idea what that means - but it is made clear that if the user provides a host in the request, that host must be included. I don't know any way to access a web site by a client without using an Internet host name. Maybe some of the 'smart URLs' in new browsers or some tricks with a proxy server ? But even in this case the proxy server MUST include the right Host - or whoever makes the real HTTP request on behalf of the client. Costin I assume it may be possible >> Saludos , >> Ignacio J. Ortega >> >> >> > -----Mensaje original----- >> > >> > >> > Craig, >> > >> > I think this bug report is invalid, since Tomcat/Apache has >> > no knowledge >> > >> > Bojan >> > >> > >> > -- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional >> commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
