Hi Bill, Sorry to take so long to reply. I agree with your 3,1,2 order. However, I confess that I'm not sure I have a good handle on the disadvantages of going with 1 instead of 3. I'll see if I can form a more informed opinion this weekend.
Cheers, Larry > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:40 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/shell tomcat.bat tomcat.sh > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:21 PM > Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/shell tomcat.bat tomcat.sh > > > > billbarker 2002/09/18 21:21:17 > > > > Modified: src/shell tomcat.bat tomcat.sh > > Log: > > Temporary stop-gap until I work out all of the ClassLoader issues. > > > > Ok, there are a couple of options here: > 1) Add a Class-Path to the Manifest (and make a comment in > the release notes > for people using Java 1.1.x). > > 2) Revert o.a.t.u.compat.* and o.a.t.u.depend.* to using > System.err instead > of c-l, since they are loaded in the System ClassLoader when > running from > the scripts. > > 3) Re-implement the required methods from o.a.t.u.compat.* in > o.a.t.startup.Main so that we can leave o.a.t.u.depend.* and > o.a.t.u.compat.* out of the jar. > > My personal choices are in order, 3-1-2. However 1 is the > easiest, and > seems to be in the direction that the proposals are heading. > > Opinions (Larry/Costin)? > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:tomcat-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
