DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13270>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13270 Container's AJP13 handler does not setTcpNoDelay on accept ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-04 19:44 ------- Thanks Henri. Certainly, Mac OS X's IP stack can be further optimized so that the interaction between Nagle and delayed ack can be minimized (Linux, which I have tested, didn't suffer as much). But I hope it doesn't take away the fact that ajp13 protocol lends itself to be a good candidate for turning on TCP_NODELAY, by default. Anyway, I took your advice and tried to add tcpnoDelay to true. Unfortunately, it didn't work. I tried both with CoyoteConnector+JKCoyoteHandler and simply Ajp13Connector. Looking at the source codes, there is nowhere in either ChannelSocket.java nor Ajp13.java that turns TCP_NODELAY on/off. As well, the docs didn't mention that "tcpnoDelay" is a valid attribute in the XML element <Connector>. Here's part of the server.xml <!-- Define a Coyote/JK2 AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 --> <Connector className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector" port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75" enableLookups="true" redirectPort="8443" acceptCount="10" debug="0" connectionTimeout="20000" tcpNoDelay="true" useURIValidationHack="false" protocolHandlerClassName="org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler"/> <!-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 --> <!-- I tried this as well <Connector className="org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector" port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75" acceptCount="10" debug="0" tcpnoDelay="true" /> --> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
