----- Original Message ----- From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:59 PM Subject: Re: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging
> Bill Barker wrote: > > >> Is it ok if I change util.thread and util.net to commons-logging ? > >> That would mean c-l will be required for tomcat3.3, and thread > >> and net would use c-l instead of the Log. > > > > TC 3.3.2-dev already requires c-l. The o.a.t.u.** classes in j-t are > > already using it. > > Sorry, I lost track of this. It seems I'm running out of memory. Well, they say that memory is cheap these days ;-). > > > >> It should be easy to modify the util.Log implementation in 3.3 > >> to support commons-logging API, or implement util.Log using > >> commons-logging API ( if using the old Log is needed ). > > > > Last time I checked, o.a.t.u.log.Log already implements o.a.c.l.Log. > > I know, but it needs a factory and manifest to be useable > as a c-l impl. ( I never tried it - it may work if someone already > added this ) I'll look into adding a factory to qlog (since I assume that the 4.x/5.x groups aren't interested :). For me, qlog does what I want, and is much lighter-weight than log4J (sorry Ceki, but implementing a 3.3 module for http://qos.ch/logging/sc.html is still on my plate, when I have the time :). > > Ok, I'll go ahead with the commits. > > Costin > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
