Remy Maucherat wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: >> If the question is about using JMX1.2 - it was alredy proposed, and it >> seems nobody objected ( but nobody did it either ). If you want to do >> that - all you need is update the mbean descriptors, and change all the >> arrays to use the JNI names ( [Ljava.lang.String; instead of >> java.lang.String[] ). And of course - fix download to get jmxri instead >> of mx4j. > > BTW, would it be possible to add a feature in the modeler to autodetec > the JMX version, and do that transparently ?
The big problem with JMX1.1 is the lack of (declarative) security. That makes it history - the only reason to support it is the lack of 1.2 support in the current mx4j. Costin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
