incompatible licenses

Filip

~
Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
www.filip.net

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Oxley, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:53 AM
>To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
>Subject: RE: Tomcat 4.1.x Clustering
>
>
>Just had a look at it. Not tried it yet, but have a query. Why haven't you
>used JavaGroups for this?
>
>Dave.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 09 March 2003 23:23
>> To: Tomcat Developers List
>> Subject: Tomcat 4.1.x Clustering
>>
>> okey dokey, a pre taste of what tomcat 5 is going to include,
>> a fully working version of clustering for your Tomcat 4.1.x codebase.
>> I wrote this against 4.1.12, but intend to test it with later versions as
>> well. Let me know if you beat me to it.
>>
>> http://www.filip.net/tomcat-clustering.html
>>
>> Tomcat 5, will ship with clustering, or at least a module with clustering
>> :)
>>
>> Filip
>>
>> ~
>> Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
>> ~
>> Filip Hanik
>> Software Architect
>> www.filip.net
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> ~
>> Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
>> ~
>> Filip Hanik
>> Software Architect
>> www.filip.net
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:33 AM
>> >To: Tomcat Developers List
>> >Subject: Re: cvs commit:
>> >jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
>> >MapperListener.java
>> >
>> >
>> >Costin Manolache wrote:
>> >> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>costin      2003/03/07 22:52:36
>> >>>>
>> >>>>  Modified:    coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
>> >>>>                        MapperListener.java
>> >>>>  Log:
>> >>>>  A Server is not required for non-standalone operation. In
>> >fact, Embeded
>> >>>>  doesn't define
>> >>>>   a server, and most apps embeding tomcat use this approach.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>  All we care is an Engine.
>> >>>
>> >>>Hmm, yes. Well, actually, no. In that junk code (I should have put a
>> >>>fixme), I'm trying to look up the hosts. I was planning to rewrite the
>> >>>code using JMX and remove the coupling (the only good solution IMO).
>> >>>
>> >>>What do you think ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> It's even better.
>> >> But you can just look for contexts - using the j2eeType=WebModule to
>> >> do the query ( but you'll have to parse the host and path from
>> >> the name - the spec doesn't define a host attribute ).
>> >>
>> >> What I think is that we should clean up a bit before 5.0 is final -
>> >> we have Embeded which doesn't extend or use Service or Server, and
>> >> is probably used either directly or as a model by people.
>> >>
>> >> Engine is the only stable point ( which makes sense ), we should
>> >deprecate
>> >> and make sure we don't depend too much on Service or Server ( except
>> the
>> >> standalone case ), otherwise some features will not work very
>> >well if tomcat
>> >> is embeded in some other app.
>> >>
>> >> And we should clean up the naming conventions ASAP. We don't need 5
>> names
>> >> ( server name, service name, engine name, jvmroute and JMX domain ) -
>> >> all we need is a Servlet Engine ID - common to all of them.
>> >
>> >That sounds reasonable. 4 unique IDs seems overkill.
>> >
>> >Remy
>> >
>> >
>> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
>> service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
>> anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
>> http://www.star.net.uk
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
>service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
>anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
>http://www.star.net.uk
>________________________________________________________________________


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to