Thanks. I think I already do have karma for j-t-c. I've been away from the Jakarta projects for a long time, however, and I haven't been able to keep up with what all the details of what's going on. I didn't feel comfortable coming back out of nowhere and checking in code right away since I know that you are trying to get a release out.
-- Marc > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 10:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [j-t-c] Thread problem in jk_uri_worker_map.c > > I'll put this one in in the interest of time, but Marc should be given > karma > (like any other Tomcat committer) to j-t-c, if he doesn't have it already. > > "Marc Saegesser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Grrrr, the attachment got stripped from my last message. Here's the diff > inline: > > Index: jk_connect.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: > /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_connect.c,v > retrieving revision 1.12 > diff -u -r1.12 jk_connect.c > --- jk_connect.c 29 Aug 2003 13:07:52 -0000 1.12 > +++ jk_connect.c 29 Aug 2003 21:37:12 -0000 > @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ > #include "apr_general.h" > #endif > > +#if defined(WIN32) > +typedef u_long in_addr_t; > +#endif > /** resolve the host IP */ > > int jk_resolve(char *host, > > > -- Marc > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Marc Saegesser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 4:41 PM > > To: Tomcat Developers List > > Subject: RE: [j-t-c] Thread problem in jk_uri_worker_map.c > > > > The file common/jk_connect.c no longer compiles on Win32 because the > > in_addr_t type is not defined on that platform. The attached patch > fixes > > the build problem, but there is probably a better way. > > > > -- Marc > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Glenn Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:55 AM > > > To: Tomcat Developers List > > > Subject: Re: [j-t-c] Thread problem in jk_uri_worker_map.c > > > > > > Henri Gomez wrote: > > > > Marc Saegesser a écrit : > > > > > > > >> That makes sense. The manipulations that map_uri_to_worker() does > > > always > > > >> make the string shorter so there is no need to worry about the > > > modifiable > > > >> string passed in being too short and needing reallocated. > > > >> > > > >> Trying to fix this in the jk/common code is, I think, a waste of > > > effort. > > > >> > > > >> -- Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > A good reason to have delayed jk 1.2.5 ;) > > > > > > > > > > Ok, I have seen Henri's commit for the in_addr build fix. > > > And I have seen Bill's patches for the uri mapping thread safe > > > bug. > > > > > > If I don't hear about any more open items/bugs for mod_jk 1.2.5 in > the > > > next > > > few days I will generate another test release distribution over the > > > weekend. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Glenn > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
