> From: Scott, Sean > > > > Seems that I miss you here... > > Meaning that the endpoint cache would no longer be a > jk_objCache but be an apr reslist instead. >
Exactly! > > Personally I dont see a problem with waiting for the next > endpoint to be returned. Theoretically the connection could reach the response timeout before the jk2 connection becomes available. So in any case the endpoint timeout has to be less then the connection timeout. Also its better to present the 'server busy' to the user then to enter in some endless loop. MT. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
