If you want to move o.a.t.u.log back to j-t, I've got no objection.  I don't
think that anybody is using o.a.t.u.handler.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: Converting Coyote to Java2 collections

Bill Barker wrote:
> I suppose that Coyote can be optional for TC 3.3.  I'm a bit less
> comfortable on using them in o.a.t.u (since that would force a Java2
> requirement on 3.3).

The thing which was annoying me the most was the attributes Hashtable in
the request.
I think util is using mostly custom structures for GC and speed.

There's also deprecated stuff in util (logging, etc). Should this also
be left in for compatibility ?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the 
intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and 
CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or 
distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in 
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this 
message and any attachments.

In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the 
Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as 
social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and 
passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to