Henri Gomez wrote: > Glenn Nielsen wrote: > >> Henri, >> >> It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook >> priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that >> the best solution for this will not be found until we have >> an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other >> modules. So if a change is made we can make sure use of >> mod_jk with other modules hasn't been broken. > > > Jean-Frederic Clere send us a link to a french site where the > Apache specialist speaking about jk2 and rewrite used jk2 > in FIRST but indicating that rewrite is the precedent.
Why using APR_HOOK_MIDDLE for translate_name : - It will be like mod_jk. - It works for me with mod_dav and mod_rewrite (fixes 21549 and 21546). Why not using APR_HOOK_FIRST: - It does not work with mod_dav. BTW: Mod_dav.c does not have translate_name I use a <Location> to get DAV activated on the needed URL. Core.c use APR_HOOK_REALLY_LAST and mod_rewrite APR_HOOK_FIRST so I do not understand why 21546 get fixed by using APR_HOOK_MIDDLE. > > BTW, there is not so many Apache 2 modules using translate in > with FIRST ... > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
