DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28961>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28961 log4j logger proxy patch [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | Summary|loggers shift files but |log4j logger proxy patch |don't roll (not deleting | |oldest files by prescribes | |file count) | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-29 18:39 ------- Yoav suggested I send code. I did. Please let him deal with this RFE, now that we understand each other. Of all the replies I got, none of them helps fixing the problem. I understand that the whole logging thing as evolved. But as long as there is any kind of logging, no matter how it is done, if it doesn't have a roll-delete size limiting feature, I will sustain this RFE. I'm more than curious to know how the "new" logging schema is done so I could adapt. But in the mean time, I took time to give you a full and simple solution and I hope you will consider it. I'm glad to hear you will use common logging or log4j, but you must tell us how to set tomcat to log there. If tomcat loggers do not roll-delete and you won't fix it, I get it. But Yoav seams interrested in this new Log4JLogger. Just insert it catalina.jar and add log4j to server/lib. Or just write an alternate version for appache common logging, as long as it roll-delete. Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
